Prepare the formulation
Define the active, carrier, and preparation method for the question being studied.
CO₂ formulation research platform
Make the next experiment more deliberate.
The ME-2.5 gives formulation teams a configurable platform to develop and compare active–carrier processing methods using controlled CO₂ transfer.
Designed for research. Application outcomes are formulation-specific and must be evaluated.
2.5 Lprocessing vessel
Controlled CO₂antisolvent pulse transfer
Static mixertransfer path
10 Lcollection vessel
A platform for investigation
Turn a difficult formulation question into a structured study.
When an active and carrier do not behave as a formulation needs, teams have to understand what is happening before choosing a route forward. ME-2.5 supports controlled CO₂ processing research, with process conditions and configuration choices defined around the application.
Use it to develop and compare methods, collect application-specific evidence, and make a better-informed decision about next steps.
What this means: the platform creates a way to investigate. It does not guarantee improved solubility, dissolution, stability, loading, or bioavailability.
The base process path
A defined path from processing vessel to collection.
The supplied base configuration combines a 2.5 L processing vessel, controlled CO₂ antisolvent pulse transfer, a static-mixer transfer path, and a separate 10 L collector.
Condition with CO₂
Use controlled processing conditions as experimental variables in the study plan.
Transfer through the mixer
Move the processed material through the static-mixer transfer path in a controlled pulse.
Collect and characterize
Recover the material and use fit-for-purpose analytical methods to assess the result.
2.5 L vesselProcessing
CO₂ pulse transferControlled path
10 L vesselCollection
Schematic of the described base configuration; final operating conditions and supplied-equipment specification should be confirmed for each proposal.
Configuration choices
Start with the base. Scope the options around your study.
Some preparation and feed approaches are selectable options or proposed research configurations. They need a technical review before they are represented as included equipment.
Base configuration described
Processing and collection path
2.5 L processing vessel, controlled CO₂ antisolvent pulse transfer through a static-mixer path, and separate 10 L collection vessel.
Selectable options to review
Mixing and compatible cosolvents
Conventional stirring and compatible cosolvents can be discussed as options. Their value depends on the active, carrier, preparation, and target experiment.
Proposed research configurations
External preparation and pumped feeds
External preparation or multi-feed arrangements may be considered for research. Availability, design, and scope must be confirmed for the intended configuration.
Application-dependent
Process conditions and recovery
Pressure, temperature, CO₂ delivery, feed preparation, transfer, and recovery conditions should be defined with the study and verified against the approved equipment specification.
A configuration conversation should identify the base unit, options, site requirements, training, service, acceptance documentation, and application-development scope before a purchase decision.
Questions worth measuring
Let the data decide what works.
CO₂ processing is one route to investigate. Compare it with relevant methods under matched formulation conditions and use appropriate analytical evidence.
Solubility and dissolution
Does the formulation change the measured behavior in the intended medium and test conditions?
Dispersion and precipitation
How does the material behave after preparation, dilution, or exposure to the target environment?
Loading and active retention
What is present in the recovered material, and how consistently can it be measured?
Physical or chemical stability
Does the result persist under a defined storage or handling protocol?
Recovery and process repeatability
Can the team reproduce the process and account for the material through recovery?
Technical evaluation
Build confidence in the experiment and the implementation.
A useful evaluation connects an active–carrier question to a study plan, analytical method, operating envelope, and installation scope. Bring your technical and operations stakeholders into the conversation early.
Start a technical discussionApplication fit
Is equipment ownership the right next step?
ME-2.5 is most relevant when your team has recurring research needs, access to analytical methods, and a practical plan to operate the system.
You have a named active–carrier or formulation question to investigate.
You can access appropriate samples and fit-for-purpose analytical support.
There is a recurring project pipeline or shared-use case for the capability.
A trained operator, site review, and internal project sponsor are available.
If the application is uncertain or the demand is occasional, begin by defining a feasibility study or another evaluation path before assuming equipment ownership is the best fit.
Technical notes
Questions to resolve early.
Use these prompts to make an application and configuration discussion more productive.
Does ME-2.5 guarantee better solubility or bioavailability?
No. Those are application outcomes to establish through formulation-specific testing. The platform supports research and comparison; it does not establish that every formulation improves or that CO₂ always outperforms another method.
What is included in the base configuration?
The supplied description identifies a 2.5 L processing vessel, controlled CO₂ antisolvent pulse transfer, a static-mixer transfer path, and a separate 10 L collection vessel. Confirm the approved equipment specification and proposal for final inclusions.
Are stirring, cosolvents, and additional feeds standard?
Conventional stirring and compatible cosolvents are described as options. External preparation and multi-feed arrangements are proposed research configurations. Ask the team to confirm availability, engineering scope, and what is included for your project.
What should our team prepare before a technical call?
Bring the active and carrier, the formulation problem, current method and evidence, target analytical endpoints, sample constraints, expected project frequency, site and utility questions, and the people who will operate or approve the equipment.
Discuss your application
Tell us what your team is working on.
Share the formulation question, study goals, or configuration details you would like to discuss. The extraktLAB team can help map a technical conversation around your application.
Prefer to call? 651.600.0036